Friday, 28 September 2012

Blog Entry 4



             There is sneering here. There is jeering at the misfortunes of others. Is there anyone in this class that thinks he’s perfect? Raise your hands.
             There are no hands.
             Is there anyone in this class that comes from a rich family with money galore to spend on shoes? Raise your hands.
             There are no hands.
             He says, There are boys here who have to mend their shoes whatever way they can. There are boys in this class with no shoes at all. It’s not their fault and it’s no shame. Our Lord had no shoes. He died shoeless.

It’s a shock to everyone when he says, the Battle of Kinsale in sixteen nought one was the saddest moment in Irish history, a close battle with cruelty and atrocities on both sides.
             Cruelty on both sides? The Irish side? How could that be? All the other masters told us the Irish always fought nobly, they always fought the fair fight. He recites and makes us remember,
They went forth to battle, but they always fell,
Their eyes were fixed above the sullen shields.
Nobly they fought and bravely, but not well,
And sank heart-wounded by a subtle spell.
             If they lost it was because of traitors and informers. But I want to know about these Irish atrocities.
             Sir, did the Irish commit atrocities at the Battle of Kinsale?
             They did indeed. It is recorded that they killed prisoners but they were no better nor worse than the English.

             I think my father is like the Holy Trinity with three people in him, the one in the morning with the paper, the one at night with the stories and prayers, and then the one who does the bad thing and comes home with the smell of whiskey and wants us to die for Ireland.

            

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Blog Entry 3


             I am not convinced of Samantha Rau’s statement at the end of the memoir that states that Santha did not really care about Cynthia because of the different name, despite them being the same person. The author chose the title “By Any Other Name”, which is a reference to Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in which Juliet says “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”. The quote states that even if the name of something is changed, the owner of that name will still be the same with all the same memories, mannerisms, and physical appearance back when he still had his original name. In the story, ‘Cynthia’ is just another name for Santha, and it is stated that Santha remembers and see’s everything that Cynthia did. Also, it is implied that she took on the persona of ‘Cynthia’ for the duration of her school time. If that had been the case, and she had not been actively paying attention with all of her effort, she would not have remembered everything in such great detail. She can remember her teachers face down to how her glasses looked like, as well as give an approximation of how many people there were in the school and what it had looked like. She states that she cannot remember the proceedings in class very well, however in the next few paragraphs she begins to describe what she did during her first day, i.e. daydream and stare at a lizard hanging on the wall because she already knew pretty much everything the teacher was talking about. This alongside other details she remembered all adds up to the fact that, even if she was not particularly interested in Cynthia, she would still remember all of the events that happened because Santha watched them through ‘Cynthia’, and thus her own, eyes.

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Blog Entry 2


             I believe that the actual quality of the thing does not change if it is given a new name. A name is just a label given to an object to try and describe it; it doesn’t actually change what the object is. Even if someone who has a name like Awesome McCoolname gets his name changed to Loser McFailname, he will still have the same mannerisms and appearance as before. The only thing that could change him would be how people treated him and viewed him after, but the name itself would not have been the thing changing him. It’s the same with abstract concepts and things like numbers, because something like “two and two make four” will always be true, even if you decide to rename four as “five”. So, the name itself is just a label to put on something, and it can be changed like any other label, but the actual subject will remain exactly the same. So, I agree with Shakespeare in that a name is ineffectual in that it has no effect on the thing it is naming. In his quote “A rose by any other name”, Juliet talks about Romeo and that, even if he changes his name due to him being from the opposing family, he will still be the same. Despite the fact that because of his name, Romeo’s character and life changes drastically in that his love for Juliet ends with both of them dead, the name itself did nothing. Why all of those events happened is because of the way people viewed that name and how they treated people with it. So, while the name indirectly caused all of these events and names have been the root cause of many other events in the past, the names itself did not actually do anything.

Thursday, 6 September 2012

Blog Entry 1


           The book I am reading for my IRB is called Angela’s Ashes by Frank McCourt. Currently I am about 1/6 done of the book, and a lot has happened. The names of the author’s parents are Angela and Malachy. Malachy is a drunk who has done jail time and is an Irish patriot, while Angela is an immigrant. They had what was originally supposed to be a one-night stand, but Angela got pregnant and her married relatives forced Malachy into a marriage with Angela. He tried to run out, but was caught. Their relationship was rocky, with alternating period of good and bad narrated by the young author. It alternated so that, whenever Malachy got a job, things would be steady for about 1-2 weeks and Angela would be happy, but then he would start drinking at around week 3 and she would start shouting at him. Most of the other events are things that the author remembers, but so far there have been 3 deaths in the family. These are Oliver and Eugene, who were twins, and their daughter Margaret. They all die to some unknown illness, but Margaret’s death hit Malachy the hardest. He began to drink after she died; because once she was born he became enamored with her and stopped drinking. So far I am very interested in the story and I want to know what happens next, and whether Malachy and Angela’s relationship will end. This is because I am curious as to the authors eventual fate with his parents, and whether or not his only remaining brother, Malachy, will die. Angela had for some reason decided to name him after his father. I want to know about the fate of the family, as well as how the author managed to get out of his current living standards.